Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703
Always has been a VGA JPEG attachment feature on this forum.
I would use it any day over 3rd party crap, I've been burned by 3rd party hosting too many times
|
Photobucket was easier when linking an image in multiple places. It makes more sense to have a central repository than scattering images about the web.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79
They can't make money off of ads if you don't go directly to their site...
|
I would be ok with a small watermark advertisement if it allowed me to link the image for free. Maybe a small Coke logo in the corner of the photo, or added to the bottom of the image.
Heck, I'd probably pay $20/year at this point for the ability to link my images. $400 is absurd, and there is no way I'll be continuing to host my photos with them.