View Single Post
Old 08-19-2008, 03:13 PM   #162 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
is there any reason

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattW View Post
My question is what is the relationship between contact patch and traction... in physics we are taught that the contact patch is basically irrelevant to friction because as the area increases the force per unit area decreases. Here my a post about it in a different thread:


Is there any reason why what I said isn't true? I don't know anything from my own testing, that was just repeating what I learnt at University.
I think the premise for overinflation,is that it would reduce tirewall cyclic deflection and deformations at the tread face which effect RR,and which would perhaps forestall standing wave.There must be something to higher pressures,as LLR concept tires all have elevated pressures,and are designed "AROUND" this parameter.-------------------------------the thing about contact patch as associated with traction may not hold up,as Don Schroeder of CAR and DRIVER conducted tire tests on a Corvette,at Chrysler Proving Grounds 300-foot skidpad,and found that when one of the very wide front tires was replaced with the very skinny compact spare,the car performed to essentially the same maximum G-force,in spite of the compromised contact patch.The skinny tire did remarkably effect turning response.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote