View Single Post
Old 08-16-2017, 02:53 PM   #20 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,806

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,326
Thanked 4,477 Times in 3,442 Posts
I've noticed a lot of people arguing the rare hypothetical scenario lately, and somehow arriving at the conclusion that if an unlikely bad thing is possible, then we shouldn't embrace the new thing. Another argument is that since things haven't worked out in the past, they won't work in the future.

Here are some equivalent arguments:

Sometimes toasters burn people and cause fires - Ban toasters
Sometimes people wreck their cars on icy roads - Ban driving on icy roads
Some people don't use cruise control - remove the option for all people
Solar energy has historically has not been economically viable - solar energy will never be economically viable

The thing is, successful things have always failed... until they succeeded.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote