View Single Post
Old 08-19-2017, 10:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
The massive weight increase offsets this. Big time.
Based on towing a 1000lbs work trailer with a small car in the city over a couple of years, weight has virtually no effect on fuel economy. Weight is just a store of kinetic energy, it's like a 100% efficient hybrid system. My new van is the size of a Ford E series, and I'm starting to regularly see 40mpg city, 50 on occasion if the lights are kind.

There are too many variables in this for any real meaning.

1. Increase in suspension height (aero drag)
2. Increase in tyre width
3. Going from a low resistance street tyre to a high resistance off road tread
4. Normal loss of economy associated with new tyres (often reported as -2mpg even when switching to eco tyres)
5. Possible loss of TC lock up at lower speeds
6. Lower RPM on the highway?
__________________






  Reply With Quote