View Single Post
Old 09-04-2017, 12:17 PM   #12 (permalink)
CapriRacer
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
https://www.thoughtco.com/silica-enh...pounds-3234486

According to this, the benefit is from hysterisis:



I don't have a lot invested in this, I'm just gathering information in anticipation of a new set of tires.
Allow me to give everyone a short cut:

Pretty much EVERY tire uses silica nowadays. It's old technology. The question is, how can you tell what the RR level is compared to the tire's grip and treadwear?

Unfortunately, you can't. Grip and treadwear are delineated by the UTQG rating - required for all P type tires (except for winter tires!), but RR is more complex and doesn't lend itself to simple testing/labeling. It varies by tire size - even for tires built exactly the same. HOWEVER, RR varies more between make/models than it does for size, further complicating the issue.

This means that trying to gain an improved RR by changing tire size yields small changes, where changing make/model yield larger changes.

A proposal to change the UTQG rating system to include RR has stalled. I don't know what the current proposal is (it was announced, but not published!), but a previous proposal ran afoul of the problem is tire size and how to label.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
Ecky (12-03-2019), freebeard (09-04-2017)