View Single Post
Old 09-24-2017, 03:45 AM   #45 (permalink)
ar5boosted
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ar5boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galane View Post
It would be interesting to see what would happen with introducing ultrasonic downstream from a throttle body injector.
My 2c worth is that internal-combustion-engines can easily digest much more water than is in that type of mist.

So mist like that, whilst looking nice, is pretty useless.

The next issue is that the life on many Chinese made Misting kits isn't very long. You're better off just spending the $30 on fuel rather than on wasting $30 on electronics to save $3 worth of fuel.

Just being honest.

Having said this, I have used fuel on those atomisers and that does work.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
  Reply With Quote