View Single Post
Old 09-29-2017, 04:06 PM   #12 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Well, it's been settled that the width is at a minimum questionable.

The other claims are also questionable.

The Bionic Chameleon Truck | Yanko Design
Quote:
This bionic cargo transport uses an innovative segmented body remarkably like that of a centipede. This enables the truck to adjust its size to the cargo load. The resilient soft tarpaulin shelled body is strong enough to protect its cargo but also absorbs impacts in case of accidents. As an added benefit fuel savings abound since the truck’s weight is slashed in half.
Terrible aerodynamics, but they didn't even attempt to deceive there with a claim.

A packaging study, but it fails the smell test.

EDIT: link to the designer's bio, he's an instructor, does some outside work.

Haishan Deng | Cleveland Institute of Art College of Art | 800.223.4700

Грузовик будущего: The Chameleon и Super Tipper Truck от Haishan Deng (обзор и фото) | Steer.ru




The rear track narrows, or should I say the front is wider, making our width discussion even more relevant.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 09-29-2017 at 04:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
freebeard (09-29-2017)