View Single Post
Old 01-24-2018, 01:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,439

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
Maximum torque and maximum efficiency are not the same with electric motors. As you point out, maximum torque is at stall, which is completely inefficient. A non-spinning motor at maximum torque is doing no work because horsepower is calculated by (torque * RPM) / 5252. The result of zero RPM is zero HP.

I'm not clear what the most efficient RPM and torque % would be on an electric motor, but it's a way more linear relationship than with petrol engines. Auto manufacturers would certainly attempt to keep them in optimal operating ranges.

MODs- This should probably live in General Efficiency discussion or Fossil Fuel Free
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Angel And The Wolf (01-24-2018), Xist (01-24-2018)