View Single Post
Old 01-25-2018, 07:45 AM   #229 (permalink)
BLSTIC
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 253

Delivery 'Boy - '86 Suzuki Mighty Boy
90 day: 37.15 mpg (US)

SkipSwift - '13 Suzuki Swift GL
90 day: 35.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 53 Times in 42 Posts
Because of the lower temperatures back there, the volume and pressure of the gasses flowing through the turbo is lower by the time it gets back there, despite the mass being the same. The result of *that* is that the turbine extracts less energy from the exhaust, and the exhaust physically fits through the turbine and its housing easier. Both of which are also important symptoms of a larger turbine wheel and housing.

However, you don't get the added mechanical advantage of having a larger turbine wheel by just plonking it at the back. I'm certain that proper housing design could entirely compensate for this though should you wish to have that effect, by having a small area, large diameter housing. I wouldn't be surprised if that's what STS do.

So it's not *exactly* the same, but it's a rough emulation
__________________







Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazyrabbit
In God we trust. All others: bring data

Last edited by BLSTIC; 01-25-2018 at 07:52 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BLSTIC For This Useful Post:
freebeard (01-25-2018)