View Single Post
Old 02-20-2018, 05:05 PM   #36 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,473

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,392 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
What about solar photovoltais area in the upper surface, compared to two kinds aerodynamic values ?

I was wondering if, for example, a 0,05 drag with low area for solar cells, could be worse than a 0,1 or 0,12 drag vehicle with a huge area for solar cells.

I will make a drawing about a solar "Morelli" or "solar Aptera" I imagined.
You would need to use a computer model to calculate the projected power increase vs the projected aerodynamic penalty, or create a scale model and test. Many variables involved.

My sense is that solar is useless on a vehicle. Under ideal conditions (pointed directly at sun and no clouds), there is 1kW of sun energy available for every 1m^2. You might get 25% of that in electricity, so 250 watts. That's roughly 1/3 of a horsepower (746 watts) for every square meter of direct sunlight.

The added weight, cost, and aerodynamic penalty for using solar cannot be offset by the meager output.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote