View Single Post
Old 03-08-2018, 02:54 PM   #18 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,442

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Just to clarify, my recommendation to take the circumference of the old tire vs new was to highlight the difference between different models of tires, not worn vs new. Different tire models will have different circumferences despite being labeled the same "size". Sites like Tirerack.com will list the revolutions per mile for the particular tire, and that number will be different between the models in the same size tire.

As our resident tire/wheel guru CapriRacer pointed out, tire design involves compromise. My point is that if a tire causes a drop in MPG, it doesn't necessarily cost more if it lasts much longer, or is cheaper to purchase. You have to factor in more frequent tire replacements, the lost earning potential of waiting at a tire shop to change the tires, and the cost of the tires themselves.

It was unclear in the OP, but it sounds like they got 80,000 miles on the LRR tires before replacing them? That is quite good.

Capri- Does a 13% drop in MPG due to tire selection sound reasonable?

EDIT:

FYI- Tirerack shows the Sumitomo turning 848 revs per mile and the Toyo at 832. The Sumitomo over-reports speed and mileage by 2%.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 03-08-2018 at 04:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (03-08-2018)