View Single Post
Old 03-31-2018, 07:01 PM   #73 (permalink)
slowmover
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
65-series covers relative safe handling & braking (in all conditions), plus not unreasonable FE.

Mercedes was equipping their sedans with such in the early 1970s. American cars, even with radials (a few years later) were still on 75-series tires. 78 on one of our cars.

Was hard to make the argument about noise, ride, etc, since suspension tuning was what was lacking.

I’ve not ever seen 60-series and wider do anything for FE. Like the the 60-mph aero wall, 65’s are the end of the pursuit of “wider” (as with “faster”; one needs to apply tools never used to chase higher speeds to understand compromise).
  Reply With Quote