That's was one thing I also explained in the giant text in the begining of this thread. But nobody reads a giant text...
The 4K 50 inch LCD took 200W while the CRT 29 inch took 100w.
Everyone change CRT to LCD takes a huge screen. No surprise if energy consume in average, from this global change from CRT to LCD, have rised.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703
My 27” Trinitron uses about 35 watts,
My roommates 36” LCD uses about 40 watts
I’m not sure that “power” hungry is universally accurate,
Because a lot of folks buy an 80” lcd they are using more power than if they had a smaller classic CRT
|
------------------------------------
Wise lady.
Buy her some flowers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
I bought Mom a 32" 720p TV and she never uses it. Her Siko TV is full HD, but that seems to be its only redeeming quality.
|
--------------------------------------
I don't remamber well about polarized, but it have ghosting, and anaglyphes have also ghosting.
And most 3D conversions are not good. And 3D TVs, are LCD and it can't have IPS panels (not much better) for 3D TVs.
So in the end it's all crap once again.
Liquid crystal glasses, flickering right left images according to the right left displayed images for 3D, are probably way better, but can broke and it's expensive.
Projector looks dull, and LCD projector have the dynamic range limitation of LCD, and we see a anoying grid projected together, the pattern of LCD. To get ride of the gride you have to adjust focus and blur the image, creating another problem.
Never saw DILA projector.
Retina Display... never saw... I bet it will shake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
So say we all. 
I think your reaction is fascinating. Have you done experiments like viewing in a mirror, through polarized filters, etc. How do you do with film at a 24fps shutter speed?
Projectors? Apple's Retina display? |