View Single Post
Old 05-06-2018, 11:03 PM   #1578 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
And the only constant is, they still get it wrong.
To ask for 100% accuracy is foolhardy.

Science teaches us 100% accuracy is impossible.

But if I had to pick the side that was less wrong, I'd pick the one that actually continuously refines their models to take everything into account.

Because they do, whether you believe they do or not.

Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Picture in your mind, 30,000 years worth of 100-year-old oak forest in a single bonfire.That's a snapshot of anthropogenic carbon.
Along with hundreds of billions of tons of coal and oil... Eek.

Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
There's a reason it is a fringe theory.

Also, diamonds form abiotically, but we don't have billions of tons of commercially-extractable diamonds under our feet.

Alsox2, in relation to that, it is likely more oil deposits exist than we have ever used. Or ever will use. Because, y'know, we can't afford to dig it all up due to EROI concerns.

Originally Posted by sendler View Post
New Nate Hagens (forward thinker) video.
compare and contrast to the "Superheroes" video
Awesome talk.