View Single Post
Old 06-05-2018, 09:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
I have only slept four hours a night for the last few nights. RedDevil, does that say that CO2 benefits plants as long as they have enough other nutrients?

As for the full conclusion that RedPoint shared:

High total pressure bad at high humidity.
Total pressure up to 0.2 MPa bad with low humidity.
Total pressure 0.3 to 0.5 MPa good with low humidity.
Increasing total pressure under constant partial pressure of CO2 at 40 Pennsylvania bad.
Increasing total pressure and partial pressure of Colorado2 good.

So, total pressure 0.3 to 0.5 MPa with low humidity and increasing total pressure and partial pressure of CO2 are good. The other modifications are bad.

Is this correct?
  Reply With Quote