View Single Post
Old 06-07-2018, 04:07 PM   #249 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,478

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,217
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Love the "just the facts" reporting.

The driver is responsible for having set the speed 10 MPH above the limit and for not paying attention.

CDOT is responsible for constructing an interchange that is confusing to both people and machines as evidenced by the repeated collisions by both.

Tesla is responsible for not being able to detect the danger that would be plainly obvious to an alert human.

I still think it would be in manufacturers best interest to have designated safe zones where autonomous features are allowed to operate, or at minimum define the unsafe or unknown zones where their systems are not sophisticated enough to ensure a reasonable level of safety.

A smart system would notice patterns where human intervention was required, and mark that zone as unsafe for autonomous travel.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-07-2018), RedDevil (06-07-2018), roosterk0031 (06-07-2018)