Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
Exactly. And the current (and still growing) population has only been made possible via that vast consumption of super dense fossil energy. And can't continue at this level of wealth, surplus, and consumption, as it starts to dwindle in 30 years. There is no viable replacement for liquid fuel at anywhere near this scale.
.
You have obviously been doing a great deal of studying since joining this thread. Have you checked out the Nate Hagens' "Blind Spots" presentation yet?
.
https://youtu.be/YUSpsT6Oqrg
.
If you really want a well rounded understanding of the feasibility of rebuildables replacing what we have now, you will want to pick up a copy of David MacKay's book, "without the hot air".
.
https://www.amazon.com/Sustainable-E...dp_kinw_strp_1
. |
Thanks Sendler,I'll try and get to all the literature if I can.
Without a computer at home and only limited time during the week to get to a computer,it's tough for me to do any meaningful online research.
I was given part of a friend's library after he passed,which includes SCIENCE and NATURE.The contributors to these mags are the folks involved in the IPCC reports each go around.They're considered the gold standard for peer-reviewed science of all kinds.
I appreciate the links.