View Single Post
Old 06-18-2018, 02:52 PM   #268 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
Yes. we can't have cars that drive right into a barrier.
.
But that above test is a joke. encountering a car parked in the fast lane, the driver in front of you snoozing and only swerving at the last split second. Any driver will be at impossibility of avoiding that.
I encountered that in Canada where there was a highway where you could either travel 50 MPH in the rightmost lane, or park your car. The car ahead of me casually turns on his signal and swerves out of the lane just before getting to a parked car, and I slammed on the brakes to avoid the accident.

Proper following distance allows the driver enough time to stop even if the car ahead turns into a brick wall suddenly.

I'll follow closer if I can see through the car ahead to see what traffic is doing, but when all I can see is the car ahead, following distance increases (unless it's a semi).

This scenario is very common, and doesn't have to end in an accident for either humans or properly designed autonomous systems.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote