View Single Post
Old 07-29-2018, 02:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,547
Thanks: 8,089
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
I like this a lot. I mentioned it at https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post574720.

Reddit points to the NYT article, but one comment said:

Quote:
The article says that the dam already only operates at ~20% of its max capacity do avoid flooding the downstream areas. That means that during high demand they already can’t produce any more power by letting more water through, so presumably they are increasing the maximum production capacity with this project by bypassing the areas that flood and dropping the water out beyond them.
If I interpret this correctly, the total power produced goes up; or at least the % of theoretical maximum goes up.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Xist (08-03-2018)