View Single Post
Old 07-29-2018, 09:12 PM   #48 (permalink)
hat_man
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Not being the mechanical type, my next question is this.....

The 3.27 was only offered in the 3.0l and 4.0l Rangers and I believe only the 4x4 versions. With the 3.27 only being a 100 rpm difference across the board, will it make that big an improvement over the 3.45, or just a marginal one?

I'm believing everything that you all are saying, but I guess it's fear of the unknown. I can get my hands on either one with a little searching. I guess it's the joys of ecomodding. No one really does what we do so there isn't a lot of information on the results.
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote