View Single Post
Old 09-04-2018, 09:19 AM   #2712 (permalink)
All Darc
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
Yes, it's too good to be true.
There was a debuking video about such batteries, but I couldn't find it again.

There was another battery, using radiactive element, promissing a life lasting of charge, but it was for very low power, and just a prototype proposal, for electronic hand devices. Is that possible in theory?

Edited... This was the video, I supose :




But Mr Goodenough new proposal wasn't said to be about 10x more energy, but the solide lithium or solidium was said to be 2x times the energy density o lithium.
The 10x proposal was from the guy, from a company.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
5x to 10x the energy density of lithium batteries?
Nope I'm calling BS on that.

The most energy dense chemical storage know to man that isn't too weird and could be useable is to oxidize aluminum with oxygen from the air. It's about 4 or 5 times the energy density of lithium batteries.

So when someone one says "my battery is 3, 5 or 10 times more energy dense than current batteries" the laws of physics say you should be skeptical.

Last edited by All Darc; 09-04-2018 at 10:18 AM..
 
The Following User Says Thank You to All Darc For This Useful Post:
aerohead (09-04-2018)