View Single Post
Old 09-12-2018, 10:13 PM   #2891 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
I wondered if there had been any house fires caused by solar installations. I found one and it was insignificant. I did not see any other stories.

"[T]he world headquarters of First Solar [...] inhabits a nice building by [Tempe] Town Lake. No solar panels can be seen on or near the building." https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news...y-boom-6456784

From the same article: "Yet there's a common-sense fallacy to the system, if the goal is to produce more solar power overall: residential rooftop installations are less efficient, for the money invested, than large-scale commercial solar plants. The Solar Energy Industries Association reported earlier this year that average residential installations are priced at about $5 to $6 per watt, while utility-scale installations cost under $3 per watt."

It sounds like the same amount of money could pay for great tracts of [unused] land and more solar panels, instead of installing on thousands of unique roofs.

 
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
aerohead (09-15-2018)