Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Nine posts in eleven minutes? I'm starting to worry. I can add this comment before the edit tag times in.
Probably respectable, but there is a problem with bogus papers passing peer review in lesser journals (See the video below (first half)), as well as the Replicability Problem.
Thanks for your perspective. All I got was 'obvious point is obvious'. Here's your reward: I'll name my own social-anarchism eutopia for you — under Creative Commons CC0 so you can use it, just don't claim it: Fremania.
For me it's simply — the hippys were right.
Here's a video that Youtube wanted me to see: Greenpeace Founder Debunks Climate Change! (Dr. Patrick Moore Uncut) | Louder With Crowder
Seems ontopic. |
I could only stomach 8-minutes of it before I was convinced that the gentleman had hit his Donald Rumsfeld moment.
He doesn't know what he doesn't know.
He has a perspicacity coefficient of zero,and he himself is cherry-picking point after point,completely out of context with the spirit of original communications.
Is he a Doctor of Veterinarian Medicine? A Doctor of Podiatry? Landscape architecture? Proctology?
He's not a climate scientist.
They may want to rush him to a hyperbaric chamber and get the nitrogen out of his bloodstream so he can think straight.I think he's been down too long.