View Single Post
Old 09-20-2018, 09:36 PM   #29 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,979
Thanks: 8,225
Thanked 8,995 Times in 7,431 Posts
??? You cut out the part where I was quoting someone else? (DDG since I didn't evaluate their link)

I agree that it's more likely the old Pacific not-ocean flung into space. I thought it was doubtful anything could penetrate to the core. The impact that led to the Snake River basin and Yellowstone apparently only penetrated 40-50 miles into the Earth's mantle.

Now I have to go look whether the Moon even has a core. ... Yup.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern..._the_Moon#Core
Quote:
Several lines of evidence imply that the lunar core is small, with a radius of about 350 km or less.[3] The size of the lunar core is only about 20% the size of the Moon itself, in contrast to about 50% as is the case for most other terrestrial bodies. The composition of the lunar core is not well constrained, but most believe that it is composed of metallic iron alloyed with a small amount of sulfur and nickel. Analyses of the Moon's time-variable rotations [!] indicate that the core is at least partly molten.[4]
Does it stutter?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

________________
.
.
Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
  Reply With Quote