[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

That's not an opinion, it's my observation that gets repeated regularly.
You know, observations, like what every other division of science but global warming are based on.
Some of the examples are:
Events like Katrina were supposed to become a regular occurrence, the polar ice caps were supposed to have melted some time between 2011 to 2013, the ice in the poles was supposed to melt faster and faster and the was supposed to be less and less, summer was supposed to run into November for most of the US, snowy winters were supposed to be a thing of the past.
Pretty much everything they have said that was specific, measurable, had a time table attached to it. The ipcc admitting that they had been over estimating the effects of CO2 on the climate by double as the reason why all the climate predictionshad failed.
The really ambiguous statements like "the climate will change" is true, but doesn't have any kind of direction, numbers or anything that could be considered specific or measurable attached to it.

The only time "climate scientists" appeared to be correct was roughly 2004 through 2015.

What are they going to say in 2020 when there is more ice than we have ever seen in the antartic?

who made claims like that? I doubt that it was climatologists.
what source is saying that there's more ice in Antarctica?