Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Riddle me this. Why do people obsess over a less than 5% variation on a 40 year sample size on a system that is at least a few millions years old?
If we watched it for 200 years we may find that 15% ice coverage change is perfectly normal.
|
Can you be more specific? I'm unsure who the obsessing people are and the 40-year sample chronology.