View Single Post
Old 10-03-2018, 01:06 PM   #3079 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
aerohead's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,296
Thanks: 23,411
Thanked 6,919 Times in 4,414 Posts

Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Riddle me this. Why do people obsess over a less than 5% variation on a 40 year sample size on a system that is at least a few millions years old?

If we watched it for 200 years we may find that 15% ice coverage change is perfectly normal.
Can you be more specific? I'm unsure who the obsessing people are and the 40-year sample chronology.
Photobucket album: