View Single Post
Old 11-06-2018, 04:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,442

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
The thing is, there's no reason to make the engine into the shape of a wheel. It's neat, and 4 wheel drive is a nice plus, but forcing the design into a particular shape, size and weight means making compromises. Better to build an efficiently shaped, sized and weighted motor, and connect the output to the wheel. This reduces unsprung weight too.

Perhaps they are cheaper to produce than a motor, gears, differential, and axle? If so, they make sense in lower performance EV applications, but when competing against ICE vehicles, EVs need every performance advantage they can get. Certainly it's not cheaper to make 4x hub motors than 2x electric motors and associated drivetrain.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-06-2018), niky (11-07-2018)