View Single Post
Old 11-12-2018, 10:48 PM   #3677 (permalink)
niky
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The believers need to all get on the same page. It makes the story more believable.
If we were actually "believers", we would be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
If the global warming religion goes pro nuclear, which its looking like it will I may find it more agreeable.
I might be able to look past the agenda driven science, throwing out observations that go against the narrative, untestable hypothesis, marathon cherry picking, obvious attempt at global redistribution of wealth.
Well maybe not that last one.
See, that's the thing. Most of us here are pro-nuclear. Because we understand it.

Hell, most scientists are pro-nuclear. As seen here:

Elaborating on the Views of AAAS Scientists, Issue by Issue | Pew Research Center

Again, don't confuse media with science. And don't confuse the rantings of the extreme left with the scientific consensus.

Oh, and look at those splits where the votes show a less than 80% consensus.

Almost like scientists can think for themselves and have different views on issues.

Almost like they're not 'believers', eh?
 
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-14-2018), NeilBlanchard (11-13-2018), RedDevil (11-13-2018)