Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
If the global warming religion goes pro nuclear, which its looking like it will I may find it more agreeable.
I might be able to look past the agenda driven science, throwing out observations that go against the narrative, untestable hypothesis, marathon cherry picking, obvious attempt at global redistribution of wealth.
Well maybe not that last one.
Obviously no one has the cure for the common cold or aids.
But 20 years ago they said hep C would always be in curable.
I expect big pharma to have an aids cure by 2030.
If some individual came up with it on their own then they would become one of the top 10 riches people on earth very quickly.
Obviously that guy doesn't believe in testable, reproducible science.
|
So, if you agree with a guy who thinks he had a cure for AIDS and the common cold - and who spread lies that are told by companies who make MASSIVE profits - it is you who have fallen for a myth.
Science is our best understanding of how the world works.
Nuclear energy is not workable - we have only just begun to pay for the decommissioning. They lied about nuclear energy - they said it would be TOO CHEAP TO METER. And it has endangered us all with the constant threat of total destruction - North Korea and Iran and Israel and Pakistan and India are all very problematic. And so is our country, and Russia.
No thanks.