View Single Post
Old 11-19-2018, 03:59 PM   #152 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 7,171

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 34.82 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,428
Thanked 1,387 Times in 1,044 Posts
Quote:
Full Disclosure: Chevrolet flew me to Phoenix, Arizona, put me up in a fancy hotel, and fed me food way better than the deep-fried motor oil I normally eat. All this just so I could drive the new Silverado 2.7-liter Turbo as well as the Colorado Bison. The Bison review is coming later, along my with upcoming motor oil cookbook recipes.
Quote:
[T]here’s a V8 option that scores better highway fuel economy for not too much more.
Quote:
Chevy itself readily admitted to me that the 2.7-liter “L3B” engine was driven in part by federal regulations, though the brand was quick to point out value to the customer: namely that this engine scores better combined fuel economy than any other Silverado motor at up to 21 MPG.
This caused an involuntary reaction that I believe would be classified as a laugh.

Twenty-one MPG is considered good for hat would normally be classified a single-occupant vehicle?!

Quote:
Most of the figures are markedly worse than those of a 2.7-liter Ecoboost Ford F-150, the model that I once called the “best compromise between fuel economy and outright speed” in the F-150 line. That 2.7-liter V6 makes 15 horsepower and 52 lb-ft more than the Chevy’s inline-four of the same displacement, and still manages up to 20 MPG city, 26 MPG highway, and 22 MPG combined in two-wheel drive guise.
I ceased laughing when I realized that these trucks are approaching 1999 Accord fuel economy:


I do not see them maintaining 33 MPG, though.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Accord versus trucks.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	74.0 KB
ID:	25127  
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
hayden55 (12-31-2018)