Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck
I don’t have a problem.
I listed four articles with slightly different takes, which the first one
“The Washington Post” was the origin of the story for the other three.
You evidently do not like the last author.
That would be your problem, not mine.
Which doesn’t change the fact that mistakes were made or intentionally included by quote unquote “official climate scientists” trying to show a increase above the natural warming trend.
If anything, it shows that “independent analysis” is not only warranted, it is needed...
>
|
Has it been proven that there was an intent to defraud? Did not the very people who published,realize their own mistake,and correct it?
And didn't everyone else mention that it didn't make that much difference in the first place?