12-10-2018, 11:18 PM
|
#815 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil
Saying he does not respect them but will abide the settlement does not sound extreme to me. But you read something different. Why is that?
|
You might read a bit early than what you quoted:
From CBS:
His warzone tweeting drew fire when out of the blue in August he tweeted, quote: "Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured." The SEC disputed that claim and charged him with securities fraud. The case was settled with Musk agreeing that his "communications relating to the company… including… Twitter" would be overseen by his board.
Lesley Stahl: Have you had any of your tweets censored since the settlement?
Elon Musk: No.
Lesley Stahl: None? Does someone have to read them before they go out?
Elon Musk: No.
Lesley Stahl: So your tweets are not supervised?
Elon Musk: The only tweets that would have to be say reviewed would be if a tweet had a probability of causing a movement in the stock.
Lesley Stahl: And that's it?
Elon Musk: Yeah, I mean otherwise it's, "Hello, First Amendment." Like Freedom of Speech is fundamental.
Lesley Stahl: But how do they know if it's going to move the market if they're not reading all of them before you send them?
Elon Musk: Well, I guess we might make some mistakes. Who knows?
Lesley Stahl: Are you serious?
Elon Musk: Nobody's perfect.
I read about it here: https://www.investopedia.com/4-takea...erview-4580249
|
|
|