View Single Post
Old 12-11-2018, 08:26 AM   #4006 (permalink)
sendler
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
We have work to do.

That's the situation 1 or 2 years back, but what is the direction we are heading?


.
.
The chart below was data from only one year ago. How much more than next to nothing is it this year? 1.5 times .003 is still next to nothing
.
.

.
.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
If solar maintains that rate for the next 26 years it would increase 11.545 times, surpassing our total energy needs within 15 years. It is unlikely it will keep growing at that rate, but hey.
Sorry. I think you are somehow being greenwashed. Right now it is easy to increase by a certain percentage year on year when you start with next to nothing. The progression of solar and wind will become more linear. 15 years for solar to replace all energy? I'm very sorry. How do you get such an absurd statement?
.
Solar is currently listed as 450TWh out of 150,000 TWh. Which is .3%. Even if you were to stop making the common mistake of saying "energy" when you mean to say "electricity", which is 20% of total energy, solar is currently only 1.5%. IEA is forecasting solar to be 15% of total energy by 2050.

Last edited by sendler; 12-11-2018 at 09:49 AM..
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-12-2018), Xist (12-11-2018)