View Single Post
Old 12-24-2018, 08:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
I don't think we missed the objective, it's just perhaps the lowest energy rate of refueling in the history of manned motorized racing. 22 kW is about half the rating of modern homes, and can add about 88 miles of range per hour of charging.

The race was all about aerodynamics, but it's unclear if any aero treatments were allowed.

The track is 2.28 miles in length, so the winning team drove 1129 miles for an average speed of 47 MPH. Assuming they started with a full charge, they would have needed to add a minimum of 220 kWh, and at 22 kW rate, would have spent 10 hours on the charger. That leaves 14 hours for racing. That's an average racing speed of 81 MPH.

Seems a bit fast to me to achieve the ideal speed vs drag ratio.

You'd want to charge when near empty, and stop charging right when tapering begins, which would probably be near to full considering the low rate of charge. The Chevy Bolt can to to 86% SoC at that rate before tapering.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote