View Single Post
Old 01-09-2019, 09:07 PM   #18 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,779

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,322
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
The flaw in the testing is not controlling for other variables. If you want to test the effectiveness of changing 1 parameter, that means all the other parameters have to be the same (speed, wind direction, wind speed, engine temperature, outdoor temperature, tire pressure....)

It's been shown that tailgate down is less efficient than tailgate up, but again your test doesn't sufficiently control the variables. The same road needs to be driven both directions for tailgate up and then again for tailgate down. There's no telling if there is elevation differences, a headwind or tailwind, etc. Driving both directions attempts to cancel the effects of elevation and wind.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote