View Single Post
Old 01-24-2019, 01:52 AM   #4623 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
If you want real science then yes.
Actually it would need to be more like 100 to 150 years more.
The only climate data that even approachs that sample size is either manipulated to show the desired outcome or thrown out because it doesn't fit the narrative or can't be manipulated.
You have to admit that looks pretty suspicious.
You REALLY need to read scholarly discussions on how researchers apply corrections to data sets if you believe that some secret cabal is manipulating all the publicly available data.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-26-2019), NeilBlanchard (01-24-2019), RedDevil (01-24-2019)