View Single Post
Old 01-24-2019, 12:54 PM   #4635 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,474
Thanked 2,948 Times in 1,843 Posts
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
If you want real science then yes.
Actually it would need to be more like 100 to 150 years more.
The only climate data that even approachs that sample size is either manipulated to show the desired outcome or thrown out because it doesn't fit the narrative or can't be manipulated.
You have to admit that looks pretty suspicious.
You are simply not correct. We have lots of data that covers million and millions of years, and taken all together is what science is based on.

Your assertion that data has been cooked or thrown out - is ridiculous and baseless. Got any evidence?
Sincerely, Neil
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-26-2019), RedDevil (01-24-2019)