Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
If you want real science then yes.
Actually it would need to be more like 100 to 150 years more.
The only climate data that even approachs that sample size is either manipulated to show the desired outcome or thrown out because it doesn't fit the narrative or can't be manipulated.
You have to admit that looks pretty suspicious.
|
You are simply not correct. We have lots of data that covers million and millions of years, and taken all together is what science is based on.
Your assertion that data has been cooked or thrown out - is ridiculous and baseless. Got any evidence?