View Single Post
Old 02-22-2019, 10:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
As shown, you will never recoup the $200.

This type of rear spoiler acts by providing a clean edge for the air to release from, plus a little box cavity action of a single plane cantilever (some air will get sucked down/in).

As pointed out on the first response the roof racks "as shown" are an issue. They are an issue for a rear spoiler than relies on attached air-flow. The disruptive turbulence the racks cause will negate any benefits of a rear roof spoiler.

The spoiler is a nice looking, but on this vehicle of little value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Removing cross pieces of the roof racks would probably make a bigger difference.
I agree.

One could remove the roof rack altogether as well.

Then the rear roof spoiler would have a chance to work, but I remain doubtful that it would ever pay for it's self.

It is a nice piece of bling though.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (02-22-2019)