View Single Post
Old 03-10-2019, 10:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
bradlington
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South Africa
Posts: 39
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
OK noted - I seem to have something overriding whatever I set the MAp to , I do not have a Cat converter, so my AFR I should be able to run slightly leaner at 15-16 without any issues.From my understanding ,the stoich for CAT's is set so as not to damage them long term .One should be able to run an engine of this type safely up at around 16-17 AFR . This will allow more gains then additionional hho will assist to further the baseline gains .(Perhaps I am missing the understanding and am not taking into account additional aspects to adding hho )

If the map and O2 was the only inputs controlling the ECU mapping I would think that whatever I set is used but again I find something taking the AFR ratio back to the 14.7 which is defying my understanding of adding the hho and getting any mpg gains.

Friday I ran 5 Amps on dry cell and after filling up the calculation was same before with no mods or hho - 0,79 l per 100 km.(My average has been 0,8 for a few years now , before the dry cell .)
  Reply With Quote