Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
The Right Angle crew address the issue.
|
The Vostok ice cores from Antarctica gave us a 420,000 year snapshot of Earth climate,containing 4-ice ages and interglacials to look at.
Given all the parameters we've been able to model,'baselines' have been identified.
And the paleo record indicates that we're experiencing 'abrupt' changes,which so far,can only be explained by greenhouse gases,anthropogenic greenhouse gases.
To argue otherwise would presume a superior mastery of climate science by non-climate scientists.A rather dubious argument.
Where does their data come from?
Is it open-source?
What statistical models are they using?
If they're using 'scientific' data for their models,and the 'science' is 'flawed',would not their 'conclusions' also be flawed,if based upon the same data.Oxymoronic?
Is their regression analysis,homogenization,Kalman filtering,Kriging,attribution studies,extreme value theories,and Monte-Carlo techniques novel,compared to say,NASA's?
Of course there are baselines.