View Single Post
Old 09-06-2008, 05:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
Big Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Whether the Euro-cars are more or less safe than US cars is completely beside the point. The lightweight Euro-cars simply will not pass the safety tests demanded by US regulatory agencies. Whether those tests have anything to do with real safty can be intensely debated. As you know my contempt for bureaucrats is fairly high.

But even that is irrelevant. If the lightweight, fuel efficient Euro-cars don't pass the crash tests, they don't legally get sold in the US. Period. End of story. Lutz is saying (between the lines) is that GM has also simmed out lightweight cars and found they would not meet crash safety standards.

The central question is: Since safety and MPG are mutually (and proportionally) exclusive, which is more important. If safety is more important, then shut up about MPG and drive your heavy cars. If MPG is more important, drive your 1,900 lb deathtrap and take your chances.

Same thing is true of enviro-regs. Which is more important?
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote