Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
In the case of EVs, squeezing out range for every kWh is extremely important. Since range can only be added by increasing battery size (expense), or optimizing aerodynamic shape (practically free), there is huge incentive to optimize the aero shape at the expense of things like ground clearance and utility.
|
Current generation EVs have all the range they need. 200 miles is plenty. That is 2 1/2 times the range of the EV I drive every day. There is little reason to compromise practical every day utility to eek out another 10% range that will hardly ever be used.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
My guess is that Tesla did a great amount of research and tweaking of the design to balance the need for utility, range, and aesthetics and ended up with the Y. In my view, the 3 looks very sharp and is quite efficiently designed. Small tweaks to it seems the right move to me for the Y. For the 2 days a year people need to haul a bigscreen TV or furniture, they can borrow someone else's vehicle.
|
The Model 3 and Model Y occupy the same space. Tesla should have used the billions they spent on the Model Y to expand into a new category.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I don't know what the roof rack options will be, but they are to be avoided anyhow. Hitch mounting is best for many reasons.
|
You cant put a kayak, canoe, surfboard, ski box or sheets of plywood / drywall on a hitch mount. You cant carry siding on a hitch mount.
Yes, bikes can go on a hitch mount but they are a huge pain compared to roof mounting. I had to go to a hitch mount with the Prius and you have to take the bikes off to open the hatch. With a fastback hatch like the Model Y (or my Prius) you also cant stand up bikes in the back of the vehicle like in a wagon or squared off hatch.
My Prii were WAY less useful than my Jetta Wagons.