View Single Post
Old 03-29-2019, 12:45 PM   #5480 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Yeah, but we weren't discussing fracking, we were discussing continuation of operating existing coal plants. It seems using an existing coal plant would be cheaper than building new wind and solar.

It being cheaper remains to be seen too. As I'm ALWAYS saying, if wind were cheaper, my utility would invite me to pay 2 cents less per kWh by enrolling in their wind program. The opposite is true.

So, coal customers would get a letter in the mail saying "Good news! Your bill will now be lower because of all this cheap wind power we're getting".

There probably are places that wind or solar can make electricity for cheaper than non-renewable sources, but that doesn't describe the majority of places. Perhaps Hawaii could benefit since they have the most expensive electricity and among the best locations for sunshine.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!