View Single Post
Old 05-16-2019, 04:33 PM   #53 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,457

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
The definition of a regressive tax is when lower income people pay a greater percentage of their income than higher income people. Sales taxes are regressive because lower income people spend a greater percentage of their income.

The only way not taxing some items would make a sales tax more progressive is if you made those exemptions based on income. Then your sales tax is no longer simple.
Person A makes $15,000
Person A spends 100% of $15,000 in the following way:

$9600 housing - tax free
$2400 staple food - tax free
$2400 healthcare - tax free
$600 discretionary at 20% = $120 tax, or 0.8% of income in taxes

Person B makes $100,000 and spends 80% of it in the following way:

$15,600 housing - 20% tax on 6000 of it - $1200
$2400 staple food - tax free
$2400 eating out/not staple - 20% tax $480
$4800 healthcare - 20% tax on $2,400 - $480
$54,800 discretionary at 20% = $10,960
$13,120 total tax, or 13% of income

As I've said before, investments are eventually cashed out. They will get taxed. This is a progressive structure that scales with spending, which is correlated with income.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote