View Single Post
Old 05-27-2019, 09:59 PM   #31 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,188
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,811 Times in 1,973 Posts
I would agree with the last two posts except that most race cars address the underside of the vehicle very well aerodynamically speaking, whereas most production cars do not.

Air flowing under the car is very important, just look how Luigi Colani took advantage of it.

luigi colani: aerodynamic race cars
https://www.designboom.com/design/lu...mic-race-cars/


https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...iew-26432.html


https://www.forocoches.com/foro/show...4212666&page=2



So yes, in general race cars suck as far as aerodynamics go, but to travel safely at speed they have to be sucked down. Cars are not aircraft, and there is something to be learned from any vehicle that travels though air or water!

1991 Colani Corvette Racer
https://www.forocoches.com/foro/show...4212666&page=2

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-29-2019)