View Single Post
Old 06-25-2019, 12:41 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,905

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,473
Thanked 2,946 Times in 1,841 Posts
To accurately measure the drag of a car, it has to be on the ground. So, raising the car is not what you want to do.

I am talking about the effect the moving belt (and its surface texture) has in the wind tunnel. It would accelerate the air in the boundary layer, in the direction of the air in the "middle" of the tunnel. And this would lower the pressure of the boundary air at the front of the belt.

By vacuuming air out of a slot at the front of the belt - this would further lower the pressure there. And it would reduce the amount of air that would be accelerated by the belt. Which is "artificially" affecting the air pressure under the front of the car.

My take is that air would need to be ADDED at the front of the belt; not removed - to offset the effect of the moving belt.
Sincerely, Neil
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-26-2019)