Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaneajanderson
The same people who are saying this stuff though are the ones who predicted a new ice age by the 90's, no more ozone by the 2000's, no ice caps by 2013, etc, etc.
Big name climate change alarmists flip flop on their story more than a fish thrown on the dock.
|
*First of all,it is because the fossil-fuel industry never proved the efficacy of their products,before they ever went on sale,that today's scientists are trying to put the pieces together in the climate puzzle.
*If you'll actually read the literature from the period,you will see why the scientists would say exactly what they said about 'global cooling',and why they'd be perfectly justified for saying it.(again,the fossil-fuel industry never spent a penny on research to determine whether their products were safe to sell).
*If Shelley and Molina hadn't stepped up to the plate,and taken on DuPont,over their Chloroflourocarbons, and depletion of the ozone layer, you might be dead already from squamous cell carcinoma,or blind flow UV-induced cataracts.
*Energy efficiency standards, and the move away from coal has helped forestall the loss of the Arctic,Greenland,and Antarctica,but they're on there way out anyway,just not as fast as without the interventions already taken.
*My advice would be to skip all the second and third parties, ignoring anyone who isn't an actual scientist involved in the research.