Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc
While e0 is more energy dense than ethanol, I think the difference between e0 and e10 should be about 3%
In a study looking at mileage with different ethanol blends the general trend follows the energy density. That being said, your mileage will vary, The Ford Fusion tested did almost 15% better on e0 vs e10, while a flex fuel impala did just over 15% better on e20 vs e0.
http://www.speedperf6rmanc3.com/cont...evel_Study.pdf
|
that's my understanding, and why I'm surprised I'm seeing such a large increase
I realize that each car could act a little different as well as all the testing controls
I probably won't need fuel till this Wednesday (that will be my 3rd full tank)
so it will be a week or so before I get a reading on regular E10 again
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf084/cf08466ca2cfc879fd772edcc6f29ab39c013d4b" alt=""
1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba001/ba001f0570949e1c5928ce173ab013f512e65345" alt=""
2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a12b/0a12bb90789a8ce1f1e4f157289e92f84d91dfb0" alt=""
1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)