Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Not a comedian. A sociological researcher/scientist tarred with the same brush as Wilhem Reich. I have no opinion on who the moron is in this situation.
How do you quantify such a thing? You take the most extensive data sets available for research and map it globally, over time, at a finer granularity than anyone else has attempted.
Then you offer a trend analysis that matches the historical record and suffer ad hominem attacks. If your getting flak you know you're over the target.
Else you monitor open sources and know everything they know, by their actions. 'Oficialdom' is reduced in the current security environment to passing communications in the clear, on 8chan.
The choice to know will be yours.
|
*so we take the entire spectrum of human potential and reduce it to 60+ frequencies.
*and since we can't predict what any individual will do on any given day,it's quite obvious that we can predict what a group will do,in a fluid environment.
*then you take this incomplete representation,in a spatial geographic distribution,over some time series
*input this 'interpretation' into some 'model'
*and the output mirrors reality?
*and you have no a priori knowledge of sub rosa drivers operating out of view,and expect a representation of reality?
At best,you'd get a story.
*state secrets would not avail themselves in the public domain until perhaps many generations has passed,and the original players were already long worm food,if at all.
*And who's historical account? New information surfaces all the time.
*an observer might devine a correlation,mistaking it for causality which doesn't actually exist.
My dog thought that dog food came from the sky.How else could it have got into the bowl?