Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Perhaps you be interested in this: www.fao.org: 3. METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BIOMASS DENSITY FROM EXISTING DATA
Or this: https://www.quora.com/Does-hemp-prod...-would-be-good
Hemp paper can be recycled up to eight times.
Well, there's your problem. Vested interests gonna be invested. Try open sources.
Netflix just lost $17 Billion in 24hrs.
At best stories are all we can comprehend. It's in our nature. Captial-S Science is a story is it not?
State secrets don't trump open source. Haven't you noticed? We live in an age of big data and weaponized autism.
Why don't you have an intellectual discussion with the dog, since you want to know? |
*I'm gonna stick with trees.It's a known quantity which may be easier for the general population to visualize.
*I've not a lot of interest in hemp.My neighbors have that one rangled.I hear it's a $350-billion/year global industry,trending towards corporate monopolization.
*without internet access at home,open sourcing isn't going to happen.
*Some communications are 'factual.' Some topics would be difficult to quantify,mathematicize,impossible for 'science.'
*Capital-S science,best I can tell off the cuff,would come down to a theory,which was based upon testing of a hypothesis,the results of which reproducible by any other investigator, yielding the same result,represented as a degree of probability.Perhaps a technical narrative would be more appropriate than a story.
*in climate change,Naomi Oreskes et al. would explain that we'd be looking at an open system and 'verification' of a model would be an oxymoron,as an open system model cannot by definition,be verified.Especially in the arena of public policy.Model results could only guide the debate.This is a theme that the 'denial' community has ran with.
*The dog analogy comes courtesy of Franz Kafka.